geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <l...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Sponsor OpenEJB to become sub-project of Geronimo
Date Sun, 02 Jul 2006 18:49:46 GMT
Jason, IIUC, Mohammed is asking if it is not better to have OpenEJB 
separate from Geronimo, not together.  Your plus one seems to be at odds 
w/ your subsequent statements.  Am I misunderstanding something?


Regards,
Alan

Jason Dillon wrote:
> +1
>
> Most of the OpenEJB developers are Geronimo developers, so it really 
> makes sense to bring these two codebases together.
>
> I don't see any problem with OpenEJB coming together with 
> Geronimo regarding to allow others to use the OpenEJB core w/o the 
> rest of Geronimo.  I believe that one of the key drives within 
> Geronimo is to make it highly flexible and pluggable.  Many components 
> are already in use by other projects (and OpenEJB) itself) with out 
> requiring the entire server.
>
> There merger of these two groups will almost certainly result in a 
> more functional OpenEJB, which means a more functional Geronimo.
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Jul 2, 2006, at 2:03 AM, Mohammed Nour wrote:
>
>> Hi All...
>>  
>> +1, but I have a question. Isn't it better to have OEJB as a separate 
>> project, as we have the intention to make it independent from 
>> Geronimo, as to have it work inside or outside Geronimo?
>>
>>  
>> On 12/3/05, *David Blevins* <david.blevins@visi.com 
>> <mailto:david.blevins@visi.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     The OpenEJB committers have discussed it and voted to be become a
>>     Geronimo sub-project.  The incubator proposl is here:
>>
>>     http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal
>>
>>     Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of OpenEJB
>>     during incubation
>>
>>     [ ] +1 = I support the move to sponsor OpenEJB during incubation
>>     as a
>>     sub-project of Geronimo
>>     [ ] +0 = I don't mind either way
>>     [ ] -1 = I don't support this move because: _______________
>>
>>     +1 from me
>>
>>     --
>>     David
>>
>>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message