geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <>
Subject Re: [jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2161) [RTC] Remove Geronimo modules from dependencyManagement in root pom.xml
Date Mon, 03 Jul 2006 19:45:49 GMT
NOTE... the m2 build in trunk is already broken... this patches help  

Since the official build is still m1 and this will not affect the m1  
build, I don't see why your point about breakage is applicable at all.

When I first created the m1 build for Geronimo years ago there were  
certainly a few moments of breakage due to build changes, but since  
there was no commit by committee junk going on then it was easy to  
just fix when things happened to get a bit askew.

The branch idea was just to make it easier to actually make progress,  
as I am move on this stuff way way faster than the lot of you can  
react to emails and JIRAs which often (as this one did) need several  
sets of emails to clarify.



On Jul 3, 2006, at 11:31 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:

> On 7/3/06, Alan D. Cabrera <> wrote:
>> I'm not following your line of thought when you mention experiments.
>> Can you provide more detail?
> (It turns out that I'm a victim of my own English, and I can't express
> my mind clearly.)
> What I meant was to refer to our m2 efforts when it works for one and
> does not for others and we can't figure out why. As many stated, it's
> unacceptable to happen in trunk, which would've had if it'd done in a
> conventional manner - CTR. Call it whatever you like - experiments are
> what suited best for me, esp. while we're experimenting with m2 build
> until we get to the point when it's ready to be applied to the trunk.
> Rather than wasting Jason's time and encouraging him to follow RTC
> rules, which add nothing but frustration and disgust, we could use a
> solution that was indeed mentioned many times - a branch. It's like a
> sandbox where we can do everything - experimenting - until we find the
> one working solution ready for RTC.
> (somehow I feel you read it otherwise, but again it might be that my
> English's not working well)
>> Alan
> Jacek
> -- 
> Jacek Laskowski

View raw message