geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <>
Subject Re: JIRAs adopter query/policy?
Date Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:01:09 GMT
I don't understand exactly what "adopter required" means.  Someone is  
required to adopt the issue?  I don't get it :-(

I also don't see how companies/customers should get any such entity  
status in jira for an open source project.  Does one need to give  
more priority to an issue from IBM than an issue submitted by joe  
user?  I don't think so... at least not based on that critical alone.


On Jul 25, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:

> As the Geronimo user base grows, it is important that we be able to  
> distinguish between JIRAs open during a development cycle to those  
> that are being hit in the field or requested by companies who  
> either use Geronimo or build products and or plugins on top of it.   
> So I suggest we provide a restricted "adopter required" field in  
> JIRA.  This adopter field would be exposed to JIRA users who  
> request and identify themselves as adopters.  So just like our  
> query for available patches, we can easily query these and help  
> ensure that these issues that companies face get the necessary  
> attention and help resolve them faster then they would be otherwise.
> Thoughts?
> -sachin

View raw message