geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>
Subject Re: GroupId for DayTrader needed.
Date Wed, 19 Jul 2006 07:14:29 GMT
Windows scares all who come close to it.  I always warn young  
children to stay at least 5 feet away or they may be up sterile.

And then I hand them a cup of coffee :-P

--jason


On Jul 18, 2006, at 11:31 PM, John Sisson wrote:

> Man, you have some serious windows scars or you need to ease off on  
> the coffee :-)
>
> John
>
> Jason Dillon wrote:
>> Um... blah... lets go back 10 years and give everything 8.3 names  
>> with mad cryptic names in one directory with a slew of meaning- 
>> deficient 3 letter suffixes to tell stuff apart.
>>
>> Oh... no... wait, lets create a long file name obfuscation system  
>> using ~[0-9] suffixes on truncated filenames... ya that will be  
>> better.
>>
>> Or lets just number all files 1-1000000
>>
>> Or how about we generate secure randoms for each file name?
>>
>> or... how about lets just put everything into one big sparse file...
>>
>> Or we could have a post processor that takes a normal assembly +  
>> config and then truncates everything and adds a metadata  
>> descriptor for resolution.
>>
>> No, thats is too much... lets just use one big sparse file...  
>> though secure random file names is starting to grow on me.
>>
>> :-P
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Jul 18, 2006, at 9:01 PM, John Sisson wrote:
>>
>>> I have already run into problems with path lengths in the 1.1  
>>> branch with daytrader now we have moved to 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT.  See  
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-6
>>>
>>> Considering the number of developers (and possibly future  
>>> developers) on the windows platform, we should ensure it works.   
>>> Even if it means we have to shorten the names.  The groupid and  
>>> artifactIds are just identifiers, you can have nice long  
>>> descriptions in the pom files if you like :-)
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> Jason Dillon wrote:
>>>> I think the 'samples' bit is not really necessary here.
>>>>
>>>> The groupId is just to organize artifacts in the repo.  It does  
>>>> not (and should not) represent the full logical structure or  
>>>> package hierarchy of the application/component.
>>>>
>>>> But, I also don't think that it makes sense to artificially  
>>>> shorten either just to hack around platform specific issues either.
>>>>
>>>> --jason
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 18, 2006, at 12:09 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I am a big fan of org.apache.geronimo.samples.daytrader.   
>>>>> But...are we
>>>>> leading ourselves down the path of a Windows dir size too big  
>>>>> nightmare?
>>>>>
>>>>> Jeff
>>>>>
>>>>> Jason Dillon wrote:
>>>>>> Why not give it is own:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     org.apache.geronimo.daytrader
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --jason
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 18, 2006, at 11:59 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The DayTrader project needs a consistent groupId for all it's
>>>>>>> artifacts. Currently, some of it's artifacts are under the  
>>>>>>> "geronimo"
>>>>>>> groupid while others are under the "org.apache.geronimo"  
>>>>>>> groupid.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I discussed this with Matt and we decided to pose this Q to the
>>>>>>> community. One option is to have a groupId called
>>>>>>> "org.apache.geronimo.samples" which will be home to daytrader
>>>>>>> artifacts, other samples we currently have and ones to come.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> One other thing to consider is the very long artifactId name
 
>>>>>>> of some
>>>>>>> of daytrader's artifacts. An example is something like
>>>>>>> daytrader-derby-jetty-streamer. When this is coupled with an
 
>>>>>>> equally
>>>>>>> long groupId name, we'll be close to hitting the path limit on
>>>>>>> windows.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>> Prasad
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message