geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sachin Patel <sppat...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: JIRAs adopter query/policy?
Date Tue, 25 Jul 2006 20:11:59 GMT
fyi

http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/adopters/

On Jul 25, 2006, at 3:01 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

> I don't understand exactly what "adopter required" means.  Someone  
> is required to adopt the issue?  I don't get it :-(
>
> I also don't see how companies/customers should get any such entity  
> status in jira for an open source project.  Does one need to give  
> more priority to an issue from IBM than an issue submitted by joe  
> user?  I don't think so... at least not based on that critical alone.
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Jul 25, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
>
>> As the Geronimo user base grows, it is important that we be able  
>> to distinguish between JIRAs open during a development cycle to  
>> those that are being hit in the field or requested by companies  
>> who either use Geronimo or build products and or plugins on top of  
>> it.  So I suggest we provide a restricted "adopter required" field  
>> in JIRA.  This adopter field would be exposed to JIRA users who  
>> request and identify themselves as adopters.  So just like our  
>> query for available patches, we can easily query these and help  
>> ensure that these issues that companies face get the necessary  
>> attention and help resolve them faster then they would be otherwise.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> -sachin
>>
>>
>


-sachin



Mime
View raw message