Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of chirino@gmail.com designates
 66.249.92.169 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=DfFlWaTqql39/ETi7s8SeIndAoy1nF4RBYBvid1y/LsK5a6o+MQG5GoQUxkHN17xUtzVDbjxw/6xlGQhIjwdFCt3/xSKGuQ2FbaKrpEjHsj1YuYX4BppBqC8vhoOwRfRw2WXGjidrEAnIYMs4eEToJBUwADCiBRznY6wKZVq8l8=
Message-ID: <af2843cd0606200631h12e4568eqc9dc46accb5997eb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 09:31:05 -0400
From: "Hiram Chirino" <hiram@hiramchirino.com>
Sender: chirino@gmail.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Where did the 1.1 branch go?!?! - Summary and recommendation
In-Reply-To: <44972A42.7070905@hogstrom.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <74e15baa0606150827j6196a402we1da1711e48f6dee@mail.gmail.com>
	 <44923623.6090405@hogstrom.org> <20060619183618.GA23550@caboteria.org>
	 <44972A42.7070905@hogstrom.org>

On 6/19/06, Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> Tony,
>
> The 1.1 branch is close and not accepting updates.  It is currently located at branches/1.1.0 and
> will me moved to tags/1.1.0 when the final approval vote goes through.
>
> branches/1.1.1 is ready for updates but we haven't agreed on the content yet.
>

See.. I don't understand why we have 1.1.1 branch out yet.  I would
think all work targeted at 1.1.1 should be done in the 1.1 branch and
WHEN the release manager feels it is time to do a release he copies it
over tot he 1.1.1 branch and starts his release work.

> I think I'm in agreement with you that it should be branches/1.1 to be consistent.  Let me send out
> a separate to hopefully drive consensus on this.
>
> toby cabot wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 12:40:03AM -0400, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> >> Working copies of versions in branches would be branches/n.n.  This would
> >> be the effective trunk for any version work.
> >
> > Does this mean that someone will be re-creating a branches/1.1 branch?
> > There used to be one, and it looks as if there isn't one now.
> > Otherwise I can do a new checkout of the 1.1.1 branch but if there's
> > going to be a 1.1 branch I think I'd rather track it than a specific
> > release branch.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Toby
> >
> >
> >
>


-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Blog: http://hiramchirino.com