Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of chirino@gmail.com designates
 64.233.184.234 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=lUu0Ein3Bx+9LjgrxR3IZIFGYgF/yLYlJxe/fuZAiMWM9pH7qsye5HUxxsZmGWYdWy+uc4NfrbEs3POJPoiWM+6yIw9sYcUBY1BZwiTNp8LHUi6E7+pJ3a3bxnhzQR6UxGRATNvFaE97EQhu3Xv9CWpQCdJAUG9erEd0Nm2xB+k=
Message-ID: <af2843cd0606051516n266d7abfw2275709184ca7671@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 17:16:53 -0500
From: "Hiram Chirino" <hiram@hiramchirino.com>
Sender: chirino@gmail.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moving the ActiveMQ gbean modules into the geronimo source tree.
In-Reply-To: <060469FD-6B7D-4B0D-8309-5B920AD08DE4@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <af2843cd0606051341t6f1ecb7al9e9b5bb7b1384b12@mail.gmail.com>
	 <060469FD-6B7D-4B0D-8309-5B920AD08DE4@yahoo.com>

Hi David,

Not really.  We are already building a rar, its the 'general purpose'
we throw all our dependencies in it so that it will work in most app
servers kinda rar.  I think I'll let customized rars be the job of
integrators or app servers.  I think that this makes sense since it
will not help the ActiveMQ standalone distribution footprint if we try
to ship a customized rar version per app server that is out there.

On 6/5/06, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
> +1, I think this is a good idea.
>
> Do you think the minimal rar we are building should move to amq?  We
> might not be the only ones who would like it :-)
>
> thanks
> david jencks
> On Jun 5, 2006, at 1:41 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>
> > Howdy Folks,
> >
> > I was planing to work on a patch that takes that gbean related modules
> > in ActiveMQ puts them in
> > geronimo.  I just wanted to make sure that there are no objections to
> > this.  Those gbean modules are mostly just gbean related glue code
> > which I think make more sense living in Geronimo.  No one else outside
> > of the geronimo project is interested in the activemq gbean modules.
> >
> > Once that part is done, then I'll start to work on merging/modifying
> > the port to activemq 4.x that was done the 1.2-dead branch.
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Hiram