Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jason.dillon@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.82.197 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:to:x-mailer:from:sender;
        b=OcpHbPHIMdCY4rS0nr0tDlHGErPtc4oW42vU04AkcpC08xdkF4SJ4gAKsyV1mO3gB/OOH27jCufQXJ5Whfy8h8z62rjcxLL5EA0DHStyEIarJx3ZjQJdOaiq4/Z4mvkOStxKh3dkeetyBMCS2V4wdlU4GyLV4lzVmd4mA0wW4dg=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750)
In-Reply-To: <44A0DF2C.7010204@gmail.com>
References: <5D194F2A-135A-4980-9D91-D92D2E62ADF1@yahoo.com>
	 <1b5bfeb50606261105o4afaa14cvbdce01a6b7af0371@mail.gmail.com>
	 <0C99DD37-4C45-404A-996F-EA83C72431BF@yahoo.com>
 <1b5bfeb50606261256x74a9d06dxf6a0220459bb858a@mail.gmail.com>
 <44A0B1C0.3040603@toolazydogs.com>
 <45E439DA-EE42-4774-B7FB-B45D6458D044@planet57.com>
 <44A0DF2C.7010204@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <DB8C9CB0-8417-4A49-B1F3-D7993D5F1AA3@planet57.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Lets start moving to m2
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 00:42:11 -0700
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
From: Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com>
Sender: Jason Dillon <jason.dillon@gmail.com>

I agree that trunk should always be buildable... though its been  
months since I've been able to build from the trunk :-P

--jason


On Jun 27, 2006, at 12:33 AM, John Sisson wrote:

> I don't think we should be removing files until we have a 100%  
> functional m2 build.  The trunk should always be buildable.
> If the M2 build isn't going to be straightforward we should have  
> some information in something like the README.txt file documenting  
> how the build should be executed.
>
> John
>
> Jason Dillon wrote:
>> I think that removing the m1 files is a good idea, as it will help  
>> force us to get m2 to build... which really should not take that  
>> long to get functional 100% of the time.
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Jun 26, 2006, at 9:19 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>
>>> Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>>>> On 6/26/06, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm suggesting that we declare the m1 build obsolete and remove  
>>>>> it,
>>>>> except possibly for the assembly step and perhaps modules where  
>>>>> the
>>>>> tests do not run under m2.
>>>>
>>>> Well, don't get it annoying, but I still don't understand it. Let's
>>>> pretend we've named the m1 build obsolete, what's next? Shall we  
>>>> call
>>>> a vote? If it passes, what would be the next steps? If you  
>>>> removed the
>>>> top-level build.xml I'd know what it'd mean, but now I don't get  
>>>> it.
>>>
>>> Yes, we call a vote then remove the project.xml/ 
>>> project.properties files.  build.xml is for Ant; I don't think we  
>>> use that.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Alan
>>
>>
>