Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jason.dillon@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.184.236 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:to:x-mailer:from:sender;
        b=Dwp64eoJ/GgsM8GWAT2ZmbJPg59fGvp3KEEaxpEdu/IWyuYH9JlWitj/xIVQ0dveANCbGAQtMecvW/a26I3wRLEXmNjfihQfpBaqfGOOOkMC75qvpUoN3HWFLeTqxSg4+Yt/Sj3xyveLpdkTOSRigvFXlAH1mnW4yxgstDdRPAY=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
In-Reply-To: <44A5653D.9060308@apache.org>
References: <20060630160706.98619.qmail@web31715.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
 <D7E3B089-895C-420E-9CEC-E2D9332691A8@yahoo.com>
 <C8A7D8FE-CFB8-4885-9ED3-78131523A8DB@planet57.com>
 <44A5653D.9060308@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <B9E75556-8F24-4BF0-B4DD-2415FB0FB30B@planet57.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [RTC] - Fix top pom to reference right plugin
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:04:19 -0700
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
From: Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com>
Sender: Jason Dillon <jason.dillon@gmail.com>

> Jason Dillon wrote:
>> FYI, we should be using ${pom.version} anywhere the project  
>> version is
>> needed.  No need for a custom property.
>
> I think its by coincidence that we have 1.2-SNAPSHOT for both the  
> plugin
> and the G codebase...if its not coincidence, then it shouldn't be.
> IMHO, the plugin should be versioned differently. In fact...I may even
> go as far as to say, the packaging plugin can be useful outside of
> geronimo itself (people building their own packages, etc) and probably
> should be in its own tree or even be a mojo.  I am personally against
> locking the G verison to the plugin version...I would like to see them
> seperated.

All modules that are part of the build should share the same version  
to simply the release process and make effective use of the m2  
release plugin.

I agree that the plugins should probably be moved to their own  
project and have independent versioning... and we will get there, but  
right now the easiest/best thing to do is to use the same version for  
all modules.

--jason