Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18447 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2006 15:42:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jun 2006 15:42:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 68581 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2006 15:42:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 68536 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2006 15:42:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 68519 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2006 15:42:19 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 08:42:19 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,MANY_EXCLAMATIONS,PLING_QUERY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [68.142.206.243] (HELO smtp110.plus.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.206.243) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 08:42:19 -0700 Received: (qmail 50908 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2006 15:41:58 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer; b=OuJsk7H2K5Ke7mcf19RcUjyx1TEAhNGesEBi3yB+6cVPn0M/pMW0eKVNa94UJGtvGeTeQmEu+AOKlMzgG1ud9ojNcVd1Ltw9ziwLgMc82/9NxD0SqYNggYEjQIxjSG4MH9KeyQ3L9JBDtKypqTukg7nhagMGF0Xq6ryfeHg7+II= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.5?) (david?jencks@66.93.38.137 with plain) by smtp110.plus.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Jun 2006 15:41:57 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: <74e15baa0606150827j6196a402we1da1711e48f6dee@mail.gmail.com> References: <74e15baa0606150827j6196a402we1da1711e48f6dee@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Jencks Subject: Re: Where did the 1.1 branch go?!?! Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 08:42:18 -0700 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Jun 15, 2006, at 8:27 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote: > Now we only have a 1.0 branch and a dead-1.2 branch? What's going on? Matt did an svn mv instead of svn cp. Matt, could you please copy the 1.1 tag back into branches/1.1? Could you please change your incipient release manager guide to recommend copying rather than moving to create a tag? Am I wrong in thinking that the 1.1.1 release (assuming it eventually exists) will be a copy of a state of branches/1.1 at a particular moment? thanks david jencks > > Thanks, > Aaron