Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of david.blevins@visi.com
 designates 208.42.156.2 as permitted sender)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750)
In-Reply-To: <44918107.8020401@wstoddard.com>
References: <74e15baa0606150827j6196a402we1da1711e48f6dee@mail.gmail.com>
 <44917EB1.9010604@joyfulnoisewebdesign.com> <44918107.8020401@wstoddard.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <8C6D6911-9A09-4EB6-B79C-20207238A1C2@visi.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com>
Subject: Re: Where did the 1.1 branch go?!?!
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:10:42 -0700
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org

On Jun 15, 2006, at 8:47 AM, Bill Stoddard wrote:

> Jay D. McHugh wrote:
>> Aaron Mulder wrote:
>>> Now we only have a 1.0 branch and a dead-1.2 branch?  What's  
>>> going on?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>    Aaron
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Aaron,
>> It was moved under tags/1.1.0.
>> Jay
>
> Comment from the peanut gallery...
> It is extremely poor form to modify 'tagged' releases. Once a  
> release is tagged in SVN, it should not be changed, ever.
>
> Comment from the peanut gallery...
> It is extremely poor form to modify 'tagged' releases. Once a  
> release is tagged in SVN, it should not be changed, ever.

We don't update tags.

> 1.1 should not have been tagged until after the vote to release 1.1  
> passed. FWIW.

It's been our tradition to insist the releases are built from the tag.

-David