Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 42386 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2006 16:29:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jun 2006 16:29:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 83822 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2006 16:29:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 83776 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2006 16:29:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 83765 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2006 16:29:09 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:29:09 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=10.0 tests=MANY_EXCLAMATIONS,PLING_QUERY,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of david.blevins@visi.com designates 208.42.156.9 as permitted sender) Received: from [208.42.156.9] (HELO cenn.mc.mpls.visi.com) (208.42.156.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:29:08 -0700 Received: from [192.168.42.16] (68-171-58-68.vnnyca.adelphia.net [68.171.58.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cenn.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA478447 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 11:28:47 -0500 (CDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750) In-Reply-To: <74e15baa0606150840m7e9ccd67u80973c36c9729a51@mail.gmail.com> References: <74e15baa0606150827j6196a402we1da1711e48f6dee@mail.gmail.com> <44917EB1.9010604@joyfulnoisewebdesign.com> <74e15baa0606150840m7e9ccd67u80973c36c9729a51@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <82686663-C980-4781-B0A4-54F94874672F@visi.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Blevins Subject: Re: Where did the 1.1 branch go?!?! Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:28:45 -0700 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Jun 15, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote: > Why not copied to tags/1.1.0 so that branches/1.1 would continue to be > available for 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT? That would have the advantage of not > disrupting anyone's work if there was code that wasn't checked in > pending 1.1.1, [edit] > Are there any advanatages at all to > moving the branch away? Exactly that, to make sure people don't "move on" and checkin work on branches/1.1 for 1.1.1 where there is a freeze on branches/1.1 for preparing v1.1 (which may not pass it's vote and have to be redone). Probably should have created the 1.1.1 branch immediately, no biggie. I went ahead and made now. > plus it wouldn't require everyone to do a full checkout > of the identical code for 1.1.1. It doesn't require a full checkout. svn switch https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/branches/1.1.1 -David