Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750)
In-Reply-To: <44891D11.4060501@gmail.com>
References: <4488E995.6090502@hogstrom.org> <44891D11.4060501@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <803A24FC-CC61-4532-A1D2-63E895E011C6@iq80.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dain Sundstrom <dain@iq80.com>
Subject: Re: 1.1 Release plan
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 14:13:53 -0700
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org

On Jun 9, 2006, at 12:02 AM, John Sisson wrote:

> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> Final Items for 1.1
>>
>> I would like to release Geronimo 1.1 on June 12th.  Yes, that is  
>> three days away.  If we can't make that date then it will be 72  
>> hours away from each candidate build.  Problem that are found need  
>> to be addressed if they are deemed critical.  Otherwise they will  
>> be tracked and solved in a follow on release.
> Unfortunately I will be off-line for the next three days.  Not  
> everybody has every weekend free, so how about another 3 days so  
> everyone has plenty of notice and there will be less chance of   
> complaints.
> The only thing that I had outstanding was changes to the scripts  
> (GERONIMO-1638) as discussed at http://www.mail-archive.com/ 
> dev@geronimo.apache.org/msg22807.html . Have made changes (not  
> committed) but they need to be tested on windows, cygwin and unix,  
> so with my time constraints it looks like this is going to be for  
> 1.1.1 .
>
> Probably need something in the release notes saying that use of the  
> GERONIMO_BASE environment variables probably won't work and the new
>
> org.apache.geronimo.server.dir and org.apache.geronimo.server.name  
> system properties are subject to change as they are experimental.

If they are experimental, they should start with a "X" character.

Matt and John is that something we should change?

-dain