Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of ammulder@gmail.com designates
 64.233.162.197 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=ijZ6DHKMS41Sa/igTl6E4GXbXu09iJpiOa52KJ8yz8T3AkaA4tn6CLnkXG5tFBDuZDyWVyw/EEtl6ZXoW3GYbwX5zoUcRIUoOl/n1Qs6QNCh4vOKn26CpCOOiv1wrwXkF++xa7WgoSNcN/1gfgVFnafP8ogqTkqRVgv73Dbo+Ds=
Message-ID: <74e15baa0606150730r4e270daid6a18ddb052039ce@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 10:30:48 -0400
From: "Aaron Mulder" <ammulder@alumni.princeton.edu>
Sender: ammulder@gmail.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [CONSENSUS] Default plugin site (was Re: Frustrations of a
 Release Manager)
In-Reply-To: <44915EA8.6020607@hogstrom.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <4488B55B.9010302@hogstrom.org>
	 <7b3355cb0606091321i2a6162iba002f6fe0b6e6b4@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4489DD03.7010509@apache.org>
	 <7b3355cb0606091351y676ffe9xf0abad76de80ecf1@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4489E2EC.6050601@apache.org> <4489ED5A.1040000@hogstrom.org>
	 <af2843cd0606141459j323ba285w5d9c948ef9045f5b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <44909C67.1060104@gmail.com>
	 <AAB148B7-4A4B-410E-96EF-DFFCFE4CF507@visi.com>
	 <44915EA8.6020607@hogstrom.org>

On 6/15/06, Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> +1 Aaron and I will work to make the Apache site work.   (We'll need some help from the infra folks :)

Um, I'm afraid I need to clarify my position.  If the Geronimo
community thinks it would be best to create and maintain an Apache
site and make it the default, I am certainly fine with that.  However,
personally, I don't think that's a good idea.  I don't see the point
in spending all the effort only to create a second site that has a
subset of the functionality of the first site (e.g. the same Apache
plugins but none of the non-Apache plugins).  Also, maintaining one
site is enough work and I'm not volunteering to help create or
maintain the Apache site, though of course I would be happy to answer
questions and give pointers to anyone who's going to do it.

Thanks,
    Aaron

> David Blevins wrote:
> > Everyone, please read and ACK.
> >
> > On Jun 14, 2006, at 4:31 PM, John Sisson wrote:
> >
> >> Hiram, I care if a private or commercial entity has control over the
> >> default option.
> >
> > I think Hiram does too, he just a read a little too fast.  His thoughts
> > are clear though.
> >
> > On Jun 14, 2006, at 3:55 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> >> All I'm saying is I don't care if IBM puts up
> >> http://www.ibm.com/wasce/plugins, I also don't care if you put up a
> >> http://virtuas.com/geronimo/plugins site.
> >>
> >> Now the default link issue is something else.  Can we point it by
> >> default at some Apache machines by default?  I'm sure Aaron would not
> >> mind, would you?
> >
> > That pretty much sums it up for me.  Aaron seems to agree.  In fact, is
> > there anyone out there who doesn't agree?
> >
> > -David
> >
> >
> >
> >
>