Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of ammulder@gmail.com designates
 64.233.184.228 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=j47oNnmZvWrlZZncf519rv+erQRQ/0f2mkh6XDf7z5NqCzhmjnxgNJSSS52z0uYPQxgcAq9liO7emlfls/WDGXF9AJzhXIsEwFoNxdY/Z0Tjm3AZyyWJXR3DvwmY6VQMdTfdPgnmhznHF9utjiHMbH6LTpUI7qs4A3oJjBryaMo=
Message-ID: <74e15baa0606081608pfae795dp203cc8f6284c75e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 19:08:40 -0400
From: "Aaron Mulder" <ammulder@alumni.princeton.edu>
Sender: ammulder@gmail.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RTC] move geronimo/site to a trunk & branch
In-Reply-To: <44883CEC.4000605@hogstrom.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <74e15baa0606071738y302e2565m42d0c39513d8e200@mail.gmail.com>
	 <44883CEC.4000605@hogstrom.org>

The move has been completed.  We now have:

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/site/trunk
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/site/branches/may2006

And the revised UPDATE script contains:

svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/site/trunk/docs .

I'll leave a day for anyone to review these and then put my changes
into trunk and sync to the site.  I hope at that point Hernan will
check his latest changes into the may2006 branch too.

Thanks,
    Aaron

P.S. The svn commit of the move terminated midway with a complaint
about line endings, though when I went to try again I found that it
had succeeded anyway.  It all seems well, but some review would be
great.

On 6/8/06, Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> Aaron,
>
> sounds like we have the appropriate +1s.  do you have a date when this will be done ?
>
> Aaron Mulder wrote:
> > Currently, the code checked in to the geronimo/site repo does not (and
> > should not) correspond to our live web site.  My understanding is that
> > Hernan has a newer revision that he has not checked in (but it can be
> > seen at http://people.apache.org/~hcunico/newsite/)
> >
> > I want to update the news and events on the current site to move the
> > expired events, add some 1.1 information, etc.  I want to do that to
> > the site as it exists on geronimo.apache.org site today, until we're
> > in agreement about what it should look like next.  Currently I can't
> > do that unless I edit the HTML on minotaur directly and lose any
> > Subversion history (I believe the content on minotaur is as of
> > just-before-rev-411192).
> >
> > I propose we:
> > - move geronimo/site to geronimo/site/branches/may2006
> > - copy geronimo/site revision 411191 to geronimo/site/trunk
> > - update the site sync script on minotaur to pull from geronimo/site/trunk
> >
> > Then Hernan can check his pending changes into the new branch and I
> > can check my news and event updates into both the branch and trunk and
> > sync minotaur from trunk.  When we're all agreed that the branch
> > content is what we want, we can either merge it to trunk or move trunk
> > away and move the branch to be the new trunk.
> >
> > I'm taking the slightly unusual step of not attaching a patch since I
> > think the description above is much more meaningful than the
> > equivalent tremendously large patch.  Here's my +1, can I get 3 more?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >    Aaron
> >
> >
> >
>