Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 84796 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2006 20:24:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jun 2006 20:24:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 60519 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2006 20:24:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 60480 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2006 20:24:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 60469 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2006 20:24:39 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:24:39 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jason.dillon@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.206 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.206] (HELO nz-out-0102.google.com) (64.233.162.206) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:24:37 -0700 Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id m7so852778nzf for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:24:16 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:to:x-mailer:from:sender; b=B9JY+coAxuqoQCkUAT9Q/y5BFmv0w0ENxwT+prC8twpZaFhR0/1YzqX1TxJu+snst3aM9O4tkF018tvGGW2Wf3R38Hnrntk2SKAdAS7/b5Gb/XeUpa0D8tt2JVUdOwXgPR1PtYiyw1FPmnZgzPqDEdqAacx8kskdRhH/IcNyPbk= Received: by 10.36.250.47 with SMTP id x47mr5224272nzh; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:24:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.20.2.85? ( [63.81.96.200]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id j7sm826497nzd.2006.06.12.13.24.16; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:24:16 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750) In-Reply-To: <6A344059-22BD-41E9-A1A8-FFD3B7284CAA@iq80.com> References: <6A344059-22BD-41E9-A1A8-FFD3B7284CAA@iq80.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <45278ADD-35C9-4444-B234-371F54DBC27B@planet57.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Should scripts be executable in releases Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:24:10 -0700 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750) From: Jason Dillon Sender: Jason Dillon X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N +1 IMO, they should be executable in zips and tgz --jason On Jun 12, 2006, at 11:45 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: > I'm not a unix expert at all, but it seems weird to me that we ship > a bunch or shell scripts in out distributions and none of them have > execute permissions by default. Is it good form for a tgz to set > the execute bits on the shell scripts? If so, I'll add an > improvement JIRA for 1.1.1. > > -dain