Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 67941 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2006 22:35:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jun 2006 22:35:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 98188 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2006 22:35:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 97520 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2006 22:35:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 97509 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2006 22:35:56 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:35:56 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [63.208.196.171] (HELO outbound.mailhop.org) (63.208.196.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:35:55 -0700 Received: from [213.94.222.225] (helo=[10.254.130.193]) by outbound.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.51) id 1FvM9e-0000tD-6o for dev@geronimo.apache.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:35:34 -0400 X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 213.94.222.225 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.mailhop.org/outbound/abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: hogndos Message-ID: <44A1B2B3.4020908@hogstrom.org> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 23:35:31 +0100 From: Matt Hogstrom User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Macintosh/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Defining the 1.1.1 release content Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Now that 1.1 is finally out the door I'd like to start getting 1.1.1 defined. One of the areas I think we can learn from in our previous releases is that we didn't have a good set of release criteria. For this release I propose that we keep JIRA's that are focused on bug fixes in terms of poor usability (NPE,s poor messages, etc.) errors (can't adjust server parameters, etc.) or just your plain old bugs. It would be nice to turn the release around in about 2-3 weeks so keep that in mind when looking at the existing JIRAs. Right now there are approximately 64 JIRAs in 1.1.1. Would everyone to take a few minutes to review the JIRA's that are currently targeted for 1.1.1. I'm not sure how to best track the issues as many of them have people assigned to work on them. If you are interested in fixing this JIRA please leave it assigned to yourself. If not then it would let people that are interested in addressing issues in 1.1.1 that its available to be taken. We'll then take a pass at the list in a few days after people have had a change to review them and make an assessement of what's realistic and vote to define the release. If there are JIRA's that you think are too big (not really a bug fix) then please feel free to move it to an appropriate target release. Jason, you seem to be the JIRA master so if you have any pearls of wisdom :) Cheers, Let bug fest 1.1.1 begin. Matt