Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jrsisson@gmail.com designates
 66.249.82.202 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=m4acbfdFFUZjzhrY8WOm8kJOKYiiCSxb9FP6rCuu8JA9NqW10HopNNGI1cKJReCGti/z+FGbOK/CGU4VMfLfI0OqhOoFtEJZENfU83vYuF5Znt2ckOvd1Slv00ierB0CV3Jr7HlsVaCRPvz2GHhpLF6navdSAUq7fVvYcVD8doQ=
Message-ID: <44A1188C.8080303@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 21:37:48 +1000
From: John Sisson <jrsisson@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lets start moving to m2
References: <5D194F2A-135A-4980-9D91-D92D2E62ADF1@yahoo.com>
	 <1b5bfeb50606261105o4afaa14cvbdce01a6b7af0371@mail.gmail.com>
	 <0C99DD37-4C45-404A-996F-EA83C72431BF@yahoo.com>
 <1b5bfeb50606261256x74a9d06dxf6a0220459bb858a@mail.gmail.com>
 <44A0B1C0.3040603@toolazydogs.com>
 <45E439DA-EE42-4774-B7FB-B45D6458D044@planet57.com>
 <44A0DF2C.7010204@gmail.com>
 <DB8C9CB0-8417-4A49-B1F3-D7993D5F1AA3@planet57.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB8C9CB0-8417-4A49-B1F3-D7993D5F1AA3@planet57.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Jason Dillon wrote:
> I agree that trunk should always be buildable... though its been 
> months since I've been able to build from the trunk :-P
>
I assume you mean you haven't been able to build using m2, not m1.  m1 
builds work fine for me.

John
> --jason
>
>
> On Jun 27, 2006, at 12:33 AM, John Sisson wrote:
>
>> I don't think we should be removing files until we have a 100% 
>> functional m2 build.  The trunk should always be buildable.
>> If the M2 build isn't going to be straightforward we should have some 
>> information in something like the README.txt file documenting how the 
>> build should be executed.
>>
>> John
>>
>> Jason Dillon wrote:
>>> I think that removing the m1 files is a good idea, as it will help 
>>> force us to get m2 to build... which really should not take that 
>>> long to get functional 100% of the time.
>>>
>>> --jason
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 26, 2006, at 9:19 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>>>>> On 6/26/06, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm suggesting that we declare the m1 build obsolete and remove it,
>>>>>> except possibly for the assembly step and perhaps modules where the
>>>>>> tests do not run under m2.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, don't get it annoying, but I still don't understand it. Let's
>>>>> pretend we've named the m1 build obsolete, what's next? Shall we call
>>>>> a vote? If it passes, what would be the next steps? If you removed 
>>>>> the
>>>>> top-level build.xml I'd know what it'd mean, but now I don't get it.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, we call a vote then remove the project.xml/project.properties 
>>>> files.  build.xml is for Ant; I don't think we use that.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Alan
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>