Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750)
In-Reply-To: <448DC7CA.7070906@hogstrom.org>
References: <448CE41F.9000304@hogstrom.org> <448DC7CA.7070906@hogstrom.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <3A927ACC-334F-49F0-8172-799046FD7F4F@iq80.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dain Sundstrom <dain@iq80.com>
Subject: Re: [Vote] 1.1-rc1 Now Available
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:00:56 -0700
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org

[Note: this is a duplicate of a post in another thread, but I wanted  
to have my vote recorded in the official vote thread.]

I have downloaded and tried out all 4 .tgz files.  Here is what I  
tested:

o I placed them into the directory /Users/dain/geronimo test/ (note  
contains a space)
o Started the servers using server.jar and startup.sh
o Stopped the server using ctrl^c and shutdown.sh
o Installed some of samples (not all) via the install links
o Installed the ldap example via the console plugin
o Stopped/uninstalled service and web modules via the console
o Tailed the geronimo.log file (stuff shows up)

Everything, looks good except the binaries don't contain the  
LICENSE.txt file.  We should be able to easily fix this in the maven  
code, or by hand after the build.  For other minor things I found, I  
either created a JIRA or started a new thread.

+1 to release the server once the license file is added

-dain

On Jun 12, 2006, at 1:00 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> I apologize for resending this to the lists.  I inadvertantly did  
> not put [vote] in the subject line so it may not have been  
> apparent.  The remainder of this e-mail is the same content that  
> was distributed last night.
>
> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> Over the past few days the outstanding issues that were raised  
>> about the first candidate have been addressed.
>> They were that we were missing the LICENSE.txt as well as Notices  
>> from the distribution.  I added them.  Guillaume also pointed out  
>> that he noted that there should be a Third Party Notices.  This  
>> was not included in the original 1.0 or previous distributions so  
>> I did not follow it up.  Thoughts?
>> Also, the 1.0 release notes were removed and updated the thread  
>> started by Hernan.  The Wiki has been updated and the wiki was the  
>> source used to create the RELEASE-NOTES-1.1.txt file you will find  
>> in the build.
>> To avoid issues with the version number and the plugins I used rc1  
>> which Aaron had added in the plugins for supported versions so I  
>> trust that works here.
>> JSisson addressed the problem with not being able to run Geronimo  
>> under CygWin and Kevan worked with Aaron to address a new  
>> deployment problem that left partially deployed artifacts in the  
>> repository.
>> I have taken this build and run some performance tests on it and  
>> we are significantly better in 1.1 than we were in 1.0.  We have a  
>> lot of improvement left for CMP EJBs.  It appears that the  
>> performance improvements in the EJB tier has changed a race  
>> condition when running under DB2.  I'm afraid that the only way to  
>> address the problem is to add a new feature to TranQL and OEJB  
>> that allow for the specification of Isolation Levels for  
>> individual beans.  This is a relatively simple change but the  
>> build as it stands is specification compliant.  I would prefer to  
>> let this release go forward since CMP 2.1 EJBs are not nearly as  
>> common as the other J2EE components.  I would like to address this  
>> in 1.1.1 however I don't think we've locked down whether that  
>> would be allowed or not.  The change would affect TranQL and  
>> OpenEJB so they are really included components so I'd be  
>> interested in people's feedback.
>> So please accept a named RC1.  Your voting and feedback are for:
>> Geronimo 1.1
>> DayTrader 1.1
>> Specs 1.1
>> The vote will stand for 72 hours.  Issues raised will be discussed  
>> and if we conclude that there is a bug that must be addressed then  
>> we will mitigate the problem and respin a new rc for a 72 hour vote.
>> If this is accepted all three of the above components will be  
>> released simultaneously.
>> Here are the builds for your review and comment:
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.1- 
>> rc1.tar.gz
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.1- 
>> rc1.zip
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.1- 
>> rc1.tar.gz
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-romcat-j2ee-1.1- 
>> rc1.zip
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-minimal-1.1- 
>> rc1.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty- 
>> minimal-1.1-rc1.zip
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-tomcat-minimal-1.1- 
>> rc1.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-tomcat- 
>> minimal-1.1-rc1.zip
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/daytrader-ear-1.1-rc1.zip
>> Looking forward to your comments and feedback.