Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 66719 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2006 19:30:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jun 2006 19:30:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 93369 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2006 19:30:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 93317 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2006 19:30:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 93306 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2006 19:30:40 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:30:40 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [199.237.51.194] (HELO green.rootmode.com) (199.237.51.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:30:39 -0700 Received: from [192.168.15.104] (68-171-62-46.vnnyca.adelphia.net [68.171.62.46]) by green.rootmode.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k5CJUBWw015542 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:30:11 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750) In-Reply-To: <448DBE63.7020200@toolazydogs.com> References: <448D84ED.2000602@gmail.com> <448DBE63.7020200@toolazydogs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <20EA8245-13E3-442E-9F91-AFF56633DD5D@iq80.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dain Sundstrom Subject: Re: [RTC] Initial reorganization of the javamail source tree. Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:30:03 -0700 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N +1 -dain On Jun 12, 2006, at 12:20 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > It does need an RTC since there's a lot of changes here. > > +1 > > > Regards, > Alan > > Rick McGuire wrote: >> Not sure if this really requires an [RTC] or not, but it doesn't >> hurt. The patch attached to this Jira: >> >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2107 >> >> Is the initial checkin for the new javamail providers repository. >> The bulk of this diff is just the javamail-transport module pulled >> from the 1.2-dead branch. The most significant change is the >> mail-1.3 module, which builds an "uber-jar" containing the >> javamail-spec jar and the javamail-provider jar. >> >> This reorg is being done in stages. Once this code is in place, >> the following additional steps need to be made: >> >> 1) Remove javamail-transport from the 1.2 build and change the >> javamail-transport dependencies to be the new javamail-provider jar. >> 2) Add the javamail 1.4 implementation to the specs tree. >> 3) Create javamail-provider-14. and mail-1.4 modules in the >> javamail repository. >> 4) Create a javamail 1.4 plugin version. >> >> Rick