Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 78858 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2006 06:25:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jun 2006 06:25:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 41349 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2006 06:25:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 41300 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2006 06:25:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 41285 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2006 06:25:12 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 23:25:12 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of eljotpl@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.181] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 23:25:12 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c39so1798410pyd for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 23:24:51 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=KMMvD/8FsIlFkEAhiAa7G5rD6J10s1rGiCGiBxnobUYkwDpS/Zy5t8n2ESZ7/2j3ghqubOk+vGmaU1FlIkORhJCoDR2B47PwcxEQeQR6GcsB+PEifn52yyq2Niqk8UCJDeEIF4rqqWex8qXtPz1LbTQFygVUMGQHhTyfVVpspkQ= Received: by 10.35.99.14 with SMTP id b14mr6841221pym; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 23:24:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.54.13 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 23:24:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1b5bfeb50606262324i3fd7216ufcf44fb5c828eb94@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 08:24:51 +0200 From: "Jacek Laskowski" Reply-To: jacek@laskowski.net.pl Sender: eljotpl@gmail.com To: dev@openejb.codehaus.org Subject: Re: [openejb-dev] [RTC] Update for new OpenEJB 2.2 Cc: dev In-Reply-To: <14F7517A-68F0-468E-A30F-6FCEF1D5691B@iq80.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <14F7517A-68F0-468E-A30F-6FCEF1D5691B@iq80.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: f6471d685f08896c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 6/27/06, Dain Sundstrom wrote: > A patch for this change can be found in GERONIMO-12345, but the > attached patch is not expected work perfectly. Any mismatches or > problems will be worked out during the final merge with trunk. Hi Dain, It had really worried me as what you said implies that we won't be able to verify whether what has been voted is really what has been applied to trunk. Before I spend time applying the patch, would you comment on the problems you might've encountered which ended up as 'not expected work perfectly'. Other than that I'm awaiting a response to Alan's question about OpenEJB 3 being considered deprecated. > -dain Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.laskowski.net.pl