Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 53804 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2006 19:56:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jun 2006 19:56:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 49284 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2006 19:56:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 49232 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2006 19:56:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 49217 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2006 19:56:23 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:56:23 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of eljotpl@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.183 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.183] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.183) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:56:22 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c30so1645250pyc for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:56:02 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=FWT3hWfo1K5aSQIL4D9Xp/tOwFT/gZkNRudfxd71xu3HN7ujQxCsQXwRNGVmingutnKy1ZcB2k5EhCkUHdDGFW9ezcKGDLCPyvn+Ft9qJ87Ku0HfyzlXxjhlfO3zRCHFAAWHB3EwccSBJfKzbtebv+3nNPbCwynyd677sx07R60= Received: by 10.35.84.16 with SMTP id m16mr6353950pyl; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:56:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.54.13 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:56:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1b5bfeb50606261256x74a9d06dxf6a0220459bb858a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:56:01 +0200 From: "Jacek Laskowski" Reply-To: jacek@laskowski.net.pl Sender: eljotpl@gmail.com To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Lets start moving to m2 In-Reply-To: <0C99DD37-4C45-404A-996F-EA83C72431BF@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <5D194F2A-135A-4980-9D91-D92D2E62ADF1@yahoo.com> <1b5bfeb50606261105o4afaa14cvbdce01a6b7af0371@mail.gmail.com> <0C99DD37-4C45-404A-996F-EA83C72431BF@yahoo.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5ff3200703f577da X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 6/26/06, David Jencks wrote: > I'm suggesting that we declare the m1 build obsolete and remove it, > except possibly for the assembly step and perhaps modules where the > tests do not run under m2. Well, don't get it annoying, but I still don't understand it. Let's pretend we've named the m1 build obsolete, what's next? Shall we call a vote? If it passes, what would be the next steps? If you removed the top-level build.xml I'd know what it'd mean, but now I don't get it. > david jencks Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.laskowski.net.pl