Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16461 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2006 18:05:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jun 2006 18:05:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 64283 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2006 18:05:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 64053 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2006 18:05:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 64035 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2006 18:05:51 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 11:05:51 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of eljotpl@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.180] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 11:05:50 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id e30so1692965pya for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 11:05:30 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=kNEMjn4uulaEwy/urgDQsyguwmP4/fK661WWvZctWfSL2NOmSYta8zDleS/Lvjhqf9ksAwnJO5YIyVLjiTe0ylXnfzn0Ui/rJ0TLh1hOtVTNRSBlLGYumTA9Jx856mNhu+TkoHcmc0sBS+q5U07gFweEfiSp4fzYgSXcYZkRsik= Received: by 10.35.34.18 with SMTP id m18mr6219717pyj; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 11:05:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.54.13 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 11:05:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1b5bfeb50606261105o4afaa14cvbdce01a6b7af0371@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:05:30 +0200 From: "Jacek Laskowski" Reply-To: jacek@laskowski.net.pl Sender: eljotpl@gmail.com To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Lets start moving to m2 In-Reply-To: <5D194F2A-135A-4980-9D91-D92D2E62ADF1@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <5D194F2A-135A-4980-9D91-D92D2E62ADF1@yahoo.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 873be6ea049446b9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 6/26/06, David Jencks wrote: > Although there are still some problems (such as not running all the > tests) I think we have pretty much all of the build working in m2 > except for the assembly stage, due to the lack of an m2 assembly > plugin. I'm not sure of the status of such a plugin, but I'd like to > suggest that we try to make the build be m2-only except for assembly, > and m1 for the assembly step until a suitable plugin exists. > > Comments? Objections? Worth to try out, but...haven't we been doing it since a couple of months? I don't understand what else we could do. Do you think about something concrete? I think I didn't read your email well. > david jencks Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.laskowski.net.pl