Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of david.blevins@visi.com
 designates 208.42.156.9 as permitted sender)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750)
In-Reply-To: <4491D0DC.10804@toolazydogs.com>
References: <4488B55B.9010302@hogstrom.org>
	 <74e15baa0606091218x16ce54aanb054588d3db838e8@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4489D11A.2090303@apache.org>
	 <7b3355cb0606091259o4bc8377ci1d57de447a07ffcc@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4489D5AD.4020802@apache.org>
	 <7b3355cb0606091321i2a6162iba002f6fe0b6e6b4@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4489DD03.7010509@apache.org>
	 <7b3355cb0606091351y676ffe9xf0abad76de80ecf1@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4489E2EC.6050601@apache.org> <4489ED5A.1040000@hogstrom.org>
 <af2843cd0606141459j323ba285w5d9c948ef9045f5b@mail.gmail.com>
 <44909C67.1060104@gmail.com> <AAB148B7-4A4B-410E-96EF-DFFCFE4CF507@visi.com>
 <4491D0DC.10804@toolazydogs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <168C5041-62A3-4157-B191-10B8BD67903F@visi.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com>
Subject: Re: [CONSENSUS] Default plugin site (was Re: Frustrations of a
 Release Manager)
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:09:53 -0700
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org


On Jun 15, 2006, at 2:27 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:

> David Blevins wrote:
>> Everyone, please read and ACK.
>>
>> On Jun 14, 2006, at 4:31 PM, John Sisson wrote:
>>
>>> Hiram, I care if a private or commercial entity has control over  
>>> the default option.
>>
>> I think Hiram does too, he just a read a little too fast.  His  
>> thoughts are clear though.
>>
>> On Jun 14, 2006, at 3:55 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>>> All I'm saying is I don't care if IBM puts up
>>> http://www.ibm.com/wasce/plugins, I also don't care if you put up a
>>> http://virtuas.com/geronimo/plugins site.
>>>
>>> Now the default link issue is something else.  Can we point it by
>>> default at some Apache machines by default?  I'm sure Aaron would  
>>> not
>>> mind, would you?
>>
>> That pretty much sums it up for me.  Aaron seems to agree.  In  
>> fact, is there anyone out there who doesn't agree?
>
> A nice temporary solution.  I think that we can come up w/  
> something better than an either/or link to plugin servers.

I know what you mean.  Maven has an ordered list of repos and there  
isn't really a "default" sans the fact the list is seeded with  
ibiblio.org.  We could seed with two or three repos if we had em.

-David

> Regards,
> Alan
>
>