On Jun 7, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:

Attention Maven Committers !

I really wish we had a maven committer too involved with the m2
migration effort. There are atleast 3 maven JIRAs that we desperately
need. Hopefully, then you could empathize with our pain and help us
get those JIRAs resolved :-)

Here are some of them to begin with -

http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-45 is needed to "flatten"
dir structures during assembly.

Am I correct that this one has no patch?  A patch would probably get applied pretty quickly
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-41 can help us extract
*-builder-* artifacts for our schemas.

There's a patch on http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/M ASSEMBLY-103

that appears to solve this problem, jvanzyl was starting to look at it.

http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-45 is needed to jar up classes
into web-inf/lib/classes.jar

Jason has applied this patch and pushed a 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT to the http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-war-plugin/2.0.1-SNAPSHOT/

I can't get it to download automatically, but I downloaded it by hand and it seems to work.  It looks like jspc is not yet turned on?

I modified the root pom.xml to enable this jar-in-war feature:

Index: pom.xml
===================================================================
--- pom.xml     (revision 413472)
+++ pom.xml     (working copy)
@@ -1200,7 +1200,10 @@
                 <plugin>
                     <artifactId>maven-war-plugin</artifactId>
-                    <version>2.0</version>
+                    <version>2.0.1-20060611.183352-1</version>
+                    <configuration>
+                        <archiveClasses>true</archiveClasses>
+                    </configuration>
                 </plugin>
             </plugins>
         </pluginManagement>                                                                                                                                                                                       

(downloading didn't work any better with 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT)

thanks
david jencks




Cheers
Prasad.


On 6/6/06, anita kulshreshtha <a_kulshre@yahoo.com> wrote:
     I have already linked GERONIMO-2066, GERONIMO-2067, and
GERONIMO-2082 to GERONIMO-2071. I am going to link GERONIMO-1740 also.
Yes, for any new work we can create subtasks.

Thnaks
Anita

--- Jacek Laskowski <jacek@laskowski.net.pl> wrote:

> On 6/6/06, Prasad Kashyap <goyathlay.geronimo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Now that we have something like a baseline of M2 in the trunk, can
> we
> > please go back to creating subtasks under Geronimo-2071 for any
> > current work that we are doing. This will help us prevent
> duplication.
>
> Thanks Prasad! I thought it was me who could not follow what was
> being
> done and meant to propose exactly what you did.
>
> > Prasad
>
> Jacek
>
> --
> Jacek Laskowski
> http://www.laskowski.net.pl
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com