geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Prasad Kashyap" <goyathlay.geron...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] 1.1 Release
Date Thu, 22 Jun 2006 04:26:38 GMT
I did a sniff test of the installed product and I think we are good to go.

+1 from me.

I shall grill it some more tomorrow.

Cheers
Prasad

On 6/19/06, Hernan Cunico <hcunico@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> John Sisson wrote:
> > Some notes in relation to documentation:
> >
> > * Clicking on the the "Geronimo Documentation" link on
> > http://myhost:8080/ takes me to
> > http://geronimo.apache.org/documentation.html which doesn't currently
> > have any 1.1 documentation.  What are the plans for the 1.1 documentation?
>
> I'm planning to update the web site today so it will point to the new cwiki with the
1.0 and 1.1
> (inprogress) documentation
> >
> > * Clicking on the "Additional Documentation" link on http://myhost:8080/
> > takes me to
> > http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/Home
> > which contains a warning that the documentation has moved to
> > http://cwiki.apache.org/geronimo .  Are we planning on changing this to
> > take users directly to http://cwiki.apache.org/geronimo ?
>
> "Additional Documentation" is using a redirect
> (http://geronimo.apache.org/redirects/additionalDocumentation.html) to point to the Atlassian
> confluence. Fixing this redirect is part of the web site update.
>
> I just froze (for edit) the confluence installation at Atlassian so we will not have
more adds there
> (wanted or unwanted). I've been adding labels to some pages on that installation to point
to the new
> cwiki.apache.org/geronimo. As far as I know, we can not add an automatic redirect directly
from a
> confluence page.
>
> Cheers!
> Hernan
>
> > Other comments in-line below..
> >
> > I'm still kicking the tires..
> >
> > John
> >
> > Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> >
> >> All,
> >>
> >> I have created what I hope is the final release of Geronimo 1.1.
> >> There has been a lot of work that has gone into this release (please
> >> review the RELEASE-NOTES).  Here are the final release candidates for
> >> your review.
> >>
> >> *DayTrader Application*
> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/daytrader-ear-1.1.ear
> >>
> >> I'm working on a website and documentation to help folks out but the
> >> deliverable is the ear above.
> >>
> >> *Geronimo 1.1 Version*
> >>
> >>   *Source*
> >>     http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-1.1_src.tar.gz
> >>     http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-1.1_src.zip
> >>
> >>   *Full J2EE Jetty Version*
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.1.tar.gz
> >>
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.1.zip
> >>
> >>   *Minimal Jetty Version*
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-jetty-minimal-1.1.tar.gz
> >>
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-jetty-minimal-1.1.zip
> >>
> >>
> >>   *Full Tomcat Version*
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.1.tar.gz
> >>
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.1.zip
> >>
> >>   *Minimal Tomcat Version*
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-tomcat-minimal-1.1.tar.gz
> >>
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/geronimo-tomcat-minimal-1.1.zip
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> *Geronimo 1.1 Source Code*
> >
> > FYI (in case you re-use this mail) the line above should read *Geronimo
> > 1.1 Specs*
> >
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/org.apache.geronimo.specs.tar.gz
> >>
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1-final/org.apache.geronimo.specs.zip
> >>
> >>
> > Is there are reason why the specs distributions don't have a version in
> > their file name? Shouldn't it be 1.0.1?
> >
> >> Please remember that only PMC votes are binding but they will
> >> ultimately make their decision based on your feedback.
> >>
> >> Thanks to everyone who has spent long hours working on this.
> >>
> >> A special thanks to Jencks, Sisson and Miller who spent long days
> >> working on getting the final release right with License issues, last
> >> minute release note changes, etc.
> >>
> >> I look forward to a positive outcome and a unanimous vote by Sunday.
> >> Assuming all goes well by Sunday night I will propogate the jars to
> >> the mirrors on Sunday and declare the release official on Tuesday.
> >>
> >> Cross your fingers, grab your beverage of choice and let's close this
> >> release out.
> >>
> >> Matt
> >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message