geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Prasad Kashyap" <goyathlay.geron...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Tracking progress of merging dead-1.2 branch into trunk
Date Mon, 05 Jun 2006 18:33:23 GMT
+1.

The m2 work in dead-1.2 included modules, deployment-plugin and all
the apps. They all passed tests too. We can consider the m2 work from
dead-1.2 merged when we have got these building and testing
successfully into new trunk.

Cheers
Prasad

On 6/5/06, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> On Jun 5, 2006, at 9:42 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>
> > On 6/5/06, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> You can see what you (or someone else :-) did in dead-1.2 with e.g.
> >>
> >> grep djencks all_changes.log
> >>
> >> I think there are 329 changes (I did about 43).
> >>
> >> I propose that as we merge, verify the changes have already been
> >> merged, or decide they are obsolete we change the start of the line
> >> to "Merged"
> >>
> >> Comments?
> >
> > No comments so far, but I guess it can only mean we're all so happy
> > with your proposal we can't speak/write anything ;) It does help me
> > and am going to use/review it. Thanks!
> >
> > Do you think it's worth to apply the m2 patches given the
> > revolutionary approach taken in 1.1? I'd appreciate Anita's and
> > Prasad's comment on it.
>
> My understanding is that the patches I've been applying from
> GERONIMO-2071 are the port of the m2 work done previously on
> dead-1.2, so this effort is already well underway.  After I went
> through the work I did personally in dead-1.2 I was planning to go
> through again and mark the dead-1.2 m2 work merged.   Is this OK with
> everyone?
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> >
> >> david jencks
> >
> > Jacek
> >
> > --
> > Jacek Laskowski
> > http://www.laskowski.net.pl
>
>

Mime
View raw message