geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hiram Chirino" <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
Subject Re: Request change to RTC Process
Date Tue, 20 Jun 2006 01:31:33 GMT
On 6/19/06, Dain Sundstrom <dain@iq80.com> wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2006, at 4:28 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
> > Clearly the opinion of some on the thread is they trust each other
> > and communication has already been fine so this is just slowing
> > them down?  Is that the summary?  I'd have to disagree that things
> > have been fine although I'll concede that perhaps some changes to
> > RTC may be warranted.
>
> I think that the model of reviewing is working and I like it.  What I
> don't like is the requirement to physically apply every patch and run
> a full build.  I feel that a careful read of the patch is good enough
> for trunk and tends to spur collaboration and communication that was
> the original intent of switching to RTC.
>

+1

> For micro releases, I taking a more conservative approach may be
> warranted, but I honestly don't see how applying a patch and building
> it is going to find more error.  For example, the NPEs you pointed
> out are likely to only be found by testing user applications, and
> when we do find one a test case should be added to prevent regressions.
>
> -dain
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Blog: http://hiramchirino.com

Mime
View raw message