geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hiram Chirino" <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
Subject Re: Do we need a Plugin Repo at the ASF ?
Date Fri, 16 Jun 2006 17:52:14 GMT
On 6/16/06, Aaron Mulder <ammulder@alumni.princeton.edu> wrote:
> On 6/16/06, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > +1 and perhaps even figure out what the url would be for the default
> > asf site.  Even if the site is not up and we are giving back 404's.
> > That way in the future *IF* we do decide to put up and maintain a
> > plugin site, our old Geronimo releases would be able to tap into them.
>
> No need.  The button in the console that gets the latest list of
> plugin sites will always download a current list.  So both future and
> past Geronimo releases will tap into the "latest" repo list.

whoa thats cool! great!

>
> As a side note, it's possible that the lists will be different for
> 1.1, 1.2, 2.0, etc. -- that we'll have separate plugin repositories
> for each major release of Geronimo just to reduce the "clutter" of
> trying to combine them.  I suspect that major releases of Geronimo
> will introduce enough change (e.g. in the classes serialized as part
> of a module) that plugins will at least need to be rebuilt between
> major releases of Geronimo.  Still, we'll always be able to adjust the
> repos listed in the "1.1 repo list" file.
>
> Thanks,
>     Aaron
>


-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Blog: http://hiramchirino.com

Mime
View raw message