geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hiram Chirino" <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
Subject Re: 1.1-rc1 Now Available
Date Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:39:36 GMT
Hey..

3.2.4 Should be up now on the codehaus repo.


On 6/12/06, Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> I talked with Hiram tonight (before catching up on e-mail so I hadn't seen this note)
about getting
> 3.2.4 closed out.  Apparently the Codehaus outage left AMQ in an indeterminent state.
 We've tested
> the existing 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT against CTS.  I would prefer to close out AMQ 3.2.4 as is
and fix this
> for 1.1.1.  Small changes can set us back several days if there is some secondary effect.
>
> Aaron Mulder wrote:
> > As far as I know, the patch is valid, it just needs to be applied to a
> > different module than it was created against.  I'm not sure if we're
> > waiting for this for the release or not.  I had hoped it would go in.
> > Hiram, do you want to look at it or do you want me to?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >    Aaron
> >
> > On 6/12/06, John Sisson <jrsisson@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I thought that we were waiting for
> >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1451 to be fixed.
> >>
> >> Aaron and Hiram do you know what is happening here?
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >> Kevan Miller wrote:
> >> > My first response went to the user list. I'm repeating on dev...
> >> >
> >> > ActiveMQ 3.2.4 hasn't been released yet? I see we're still including
> >> > ActiveMQ 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT in our repository. What's the plan, there?
> >> >
> >> > I don't think we can release until ActiveMQ has released... Is there
> >> > some problem?
> >> >
> >> > --kevan
> >> >
> >> > On Jun 11, 2006, at 11:48 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Over the past few days the outstanding issues that were raised about
> >> >> the first candidate have been addressed.
> >> >>
> >> >> They were that we were missing the LICENSE.txt as well as Notices
> >> >> from the distribution.  I added them.  Guillaume also pointed out
> >> >> that he noted that there should be a Third Party Notices.  This was
> >> >> not included in the original 1.0 or previous distributions so I did
> >> >> not follow it up.  Thoughts?
> >> >>
> >> >> Also, the 1.0 release notes were removed and updated the thread
> >> >> started by Hernan.  The Wiki has been updated and the wiki was the
> >> >> source used to create the RELEASE-NOTES-1.1.txt file you will find
in
> >> >> the build.
> >> >>
> >> >> To avoid issues with the version number and the plugins I used rc1
> >> >> which Aaron had added in the plugins for supported versions so I
> >> >> trust that works here.
> >> >>
> >> >> JSisson addressed the problem with not being able to run Geronimo
> >> >> under CygWin and Kevan worked with Aaron to address a new deployment
> >> >> problem that left partially deployed artifacts in the repository.
> >> >>
> >> >> I have taken this build and run some performance tests on it and we
> >> >> are significantly better in 1.1 than we were in 1.0.  We have a lot
> >> >> of improvement left for CMP EJBs.  It appears that the performance
> >> >> improvements in the EJB tier has changed a race condition when
> >> >> running under DB2.  I'm afraid that the only way to address the
> >> >> problem is to add a new feature to TranQL and OEJB that allow for the
> >> >> specification of Isolation Levels for individual beans.  This is a
> >> >> relatively simple change but the build as it stands is specification
> >> >> compliant.  I would prefer to let this release go forward since CMP
> >> >> 2.1 EJBs are not nearly as common as the other J2EE components.  I
> >> >> would like to address this in 1.1.1 however I don't think we've
> >> >> locked down whether that would be allowed or not.  The change would
> >> >> affect TranQL and OpenEJB so they are really included components so
> >> >> I'd be interested in people's feedback.
> >> >>
> >> >> So please accept a named RC1.  Your voting and feedback are for:
> >> >>
> >> >> Geronimo 1.1
> >> >> DayTrader 1.1
> >> >> Specs 1.1
> >> >>
> >> >> The vote will stand for 72 hours.  Issues raised will be discussed
> >> >> and if we conclude that there is a bug that must be addressed then
we
> >> >> will mitigate the problem and respin a new rc for a 72 hour vote.
> >> >>
> >> >> If this is accepted all three of the above components will be
> >> >> released simultaneously.
> >> >>
> >> >> Here are the builds for your review and comment:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.1-rc1.tar.gz
> >> >>
> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.1-rc1.zip
> >> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.1-rc1.tar.gz
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-romcat-j2ee-1.1-rc1.zip
> >> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-minimal-1.1-rc1.tar.gz
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-minimal-1.1-rc1.zip
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-tomcat-minimal-1.1-rc1.tar.gz
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-tomcat-minimal-1.1-rc1.zip
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/daytrader-ear-1.1-rc1.zip
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Looking forward to your comments and feedback.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>


-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Mime
View raw message