geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hiram Chirino" <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
Subject Re: Moving the ActiveMQ gbean modules into the geronimo source tree.
Date Mon, 05 Jun 2006 21:13:17 GMT
On 6/5/06, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
> I think that is fine, as long as we get the activemq folks here (like
> you), to help us keep these gbeans in sync with the latest activemq.
>

+1

>  * * *
>
> Completely unrelated... well sorta... I really think we should think
> about using activemq for all cluster or inter-geronimo node
> communication.  Even if user wants to use another jms for their app, G
> would still use activemq as its messaging backbone.
>
> Btw... I love activemq... so maybe I'm biased.
>

lol!  It does have some nice stuff in it.  But lets not go that
crazy...  Perhaps we just start be defining our clustering
requirements as nice set of interfaces that the default implementation
using some ultra fast messaging like ActiveMQ! :)

Regards,
Hiram

> --jason
>
>
> On 6/5/06, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > Howdy Folks,
> >
> > I was planing to work on a patch that takes that gbean related modules
> > in ActiveMQ puts them in
> > geronimo.  I just wanted to make sure that there are no objections to
> > this.  Those gbean modules are mostly just gbean related glue code
> > which I think make more sense living in Geronimo.  No one else outside
> > of the geronimo project is interested in the activemq gbean modules.
> >
> > Once that part is done, then I'll start to work on merging/modifying
> > the port to activemq 4.x that was done the 1.2-dead branch.
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
>


-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Mime
View raw message