geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>
Subject Re: Lets start moving to m2
Date Tue, 27 Jun 2006 07:42:11 GMT
I agree that trunk should always be buildable... though its been  
months since I've been able to build from the trunk :-P

--jason


On Jun 27, 2006, at 12:33 AM, John Sisson wrote:

> I don't think we should be removing files until we have a 100%  
> functional m2 build.  The trunk should always be buildable.
> If the M2 build isn't going to be straightforward we should have  
> some information in something like the README.txt file documenting  
> how the build should be executed.
>
> John
>
> Jason Dillon wrote:
>> I think that removing the m1 files is a good idea, as it will help  
>> force us to get m2 to build... which really should not take that  
>> long to get functional 100% of the time.
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Jun 26, 2006, at 9:19 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>
>>> Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>>>> On 6/26/06, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm suggesting that we declare the m1 build obsolete and remove  
>>>>> it,
>>>>> except possibly for the assembly step and perhaps modules where  
>>>>> the
>>>>> tests do not run under m2.
>>>>
>>>> Well, don't get it annoying, but I still don't understand it. Let's
>>>> pretend we've named the m1 build obsolete, what's next? Shall we  
>>>> call
>>>> a vote? If it passes, what would be the next steps? If you  
>>>> removed the
>>>> top-level build.xml I'd know what it'd mean, but now I don't get  
>>>> it.
>>>
>>> Yes, we call a vote then remove the project.xml/ 
>>> project.properties files.  build.xml is for Ant; I don't think we  
>>> use that.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Alan
>>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message