geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dain Sundstrom <d...@iq80.com>
Subject Re: Thoughts about what a release is
Date Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:53:33 GMT
On Jun 12, 2006, at 11:46 AM, David Blevins wrote:

> On Jun 11, 2006, at 6:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>> Features would not get scheduled in until someone actually commits  
>> to doing that feature.
>
> I like this approach for most things.  There will always be the  
> need to say "x needs to be fixed to ship this release" even if no  
> one is signed up to work on it.  I just wish we'd vote or come to a  
> consensus on items like these *before* they get assigned to a  
> release.  IMHO, having to +1 it to be added to the release means  
> among many things you 1) saw it, 2) know about it, 3) are fully  
> aware of what is outstanding and not yet being worked on, and 4)  
> you agree with it.
>
> I'm fine voting on blocks of related issues all at once to speed up  
> the process.
>
> I think having to agree before hand on what goes in and what's  
> required for a release will force us to talk about things earlier  
> in the release cycle rather than later.

Cool idea.  I think we should try it out.

+1 to vote on scheduling a feature in a release

-dain

Mime
View raw message