geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dain Sundstrom <d...@iq80.com>
Subject Re: [RTC] m2-plugins deployment plugin
Date Wed, 07 Jun 2006 17:29:06 GMT
On Jun 7, 2006, at 10:18 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:

> On 6/7/06, Dain Sundstrom <dain@iq80.com> wrote:
>> On Jun 7, 2006, at 5:43 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>>
>> > On 6/7/06, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> > It doesn't count, though ;-)
>> >>
>> >> Why not?  Because I edited prasad's patch for formatting and  
>> removed
>> >> unused cruft?  Ken's directive requires 3 +1 votes from committers
>> >> other than the proposer (who apparently does not need to be a
>> >> committer): although the document he appears to have adapted  
>> states
>> >> only PMC member votes count, that is not in his directive.   
>> Since he
>> >> hasn't responded to requests for clarification I think we have to
>> >> take him at his word.
>> >
>> > The proposer (!= the author) == DJ nor Prasad => DJ may not vote  
>> for
>> > it. Is that correct?
>>
>> FWIU, everyone can vote, but only the votes of committers count.  To
>> apply a patch, you need 4 +1 votes, and your own +1 counts as the
>> first of the four.
>
> That's exactly how I understand it! Note the difference in the numbers
> - I hope it's not a mistake - there's 4 +1 votes in your email whereas
> Dave mentioned 3 +1 votes. The difference is where I stand - apart
> from Dave's own +1 he needs 3 more, doesn't he?

I seem to have cut of the important part of david's email.  Anyway, I  
agree he needs 3 more +1 in addition to his own.

-dain

Mime
View raw message