geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bruce Snyder" <>
Subject Re: Frustrations of a Release Manager
Date Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:31:38 GMT
On 6/9/06, Davanum Srinivas <> wrote:
> Sigh! :( Looks like all efforts are down the drain.
> On 6/9/06, Aaron Mulder <> wrote:
> > I don't see what's wrong with a group of folks interested in Gernoimo
> > getting together to talk about Geronimo.  So long as it's positioned
> > as discussion not decision-making, of course -- which, as I recall, it
> > was.

Dims, statements like that don't work to bring the community together,
they only cause more animosity. Let's try to move beyond the jabs and
let the people with unresolved issues air their concerns so that they
can work together.

Yet again I'm now thoroughly confused on this whole topic. Does this
mean that nobody can even talk about Geronimo unless it's on-list in
some way? Does this mean if someone at a client site or a local JUG or
anywhere asks me questions about Geronimo that I must either tell them
to ask on the list because I'm not allowed to talk about it or post my
conversation to the list after the fact?

I really am seriously confused because of so many mixed messages from
so many people about this topic. Please help me understand.

perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"

Apache Geronimo -
Apache ActiveMQ -
Apache ServiceMix -
Castor -

View raw message