geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dain Sundstrom <d...@iq80.com>
Subject Re: [openejb-dev] Merge of OpenEJB branch dead_2_2
Date Tue, 20 Jun 2006 19:33:04 GMT
Done.

I noted which ones I merged into branches/dain/openejb-2.2-merge.  If  
we ultimately merge changes from that branch to trunk, we should  
change the status.

-dain

On Jun 20, 2006, at 6:11 AM, David Jencks wrote:

> Can you please try to annotate trunk's all_changes.log file to  
> track which revisions you are dealing with?
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Jun 19, 2006, at 1:46 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>
>> I've discovered that I need a bunch of patched from geronimo's  
>> dead-1.2 branch to make openejb's dead_2_2 version work.  The  
>> problem is these patches need openejb dead_2_2 or we will get  
>> compile errors.  To ease this situation, I have created a private  
>> working directory for myself at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ 
>> geronimo/branches/dain/openejb-2.2-merge.  I will try to keep the  
>> changes as simple as possible, svn merge commands mostly.  I'll do  
>> my best to document the svn commands to recreate the changes.
>>
>> -dain
>>
>> On Jun 16, 2006, at 8:55 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>>
>>> I've spent the better part of a day researching the changes in  
>>> 2.0->dead_2_2 verses the changes in 2.0->trunk, and I have come  
>>> to the conclusion it will be easier to simply dead_2_2 to run in  
>>> Geronimo trunk than it will be to apply the dead_2_2 changes to  
>>> the OpenEJB trunk.  Here is more info on what I found in much  
>>> more detail:
>>>
>>> 2664->HEAD - Packaging for release an branch cutting
>>>
>>> 2595->2664 - A few new features such like xbean serialization,  
>>> MEJB rewrite, jndi changes (mount gbeans into jnid) and  
>>> configuration manager patches
>>>
>>> branch_1_1->2585 - Main work in 1.1.  This is 99% changes caused  
>>> by API changes in Geronimo
>>>
>>> configid->branch_1_1 - Minor work to prove configid changes would  
>>> work
>>>
>>> 1_0 -> configid - configid was cut directly from 1.0 but a few  
>>> changes made it in for 1.0.1.  These were merged into the  
>>> configid branch immediately before it was renamed to branch_1_1  
>>> (r2522).
>>>
>>>
>>> Based on this data, I'm going to make a copy of the dead_2_2  
>>> branch and attempt to update it to the new apis by hand.  Once  
>>> this is done, all of us will need to scan over the change log  
>>> between configid and head to make sure all important fixes or  
>>> features are present in the dead_2_2 branch.  If you already know  
>>> about important stuff in head that needs to be pulled over, let  
>>> me know by responding to this email and I'll try to get it in  
>>> (make sure to CC dev@openejb.codehaus.org and  
>>> dev@geronimo.apache.org).
>>>
>>> Right now, I'm not sure this plan will work, but by Sunday I  
>>> should know.
>>>
>>> -dain
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>>>
>>>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>


Mime
View raw message