I'd just like to know why you are really, really against it?
I don't like it, but as a short-term solution I think it is okay.
But, hopefully we will have openejb snaps deployed to a repo soon so
we won't need to do this.
--jason
On Jun 30, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> As I mentioned in a previous thread. I am really, really, against
> this. I'm happy to discuss this further.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> Bill Dudney wrote:
>> Hi Jacek,
>>
>> Yep just edit the svn:externals property on geronimo and you are
>> done :-)
>>
>> TTFN,
>>
>>
>> Bill Dudney
>> MyFaces - http://myfaces.apache.org
>> Cayenne - http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cayenne.html
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jun 29, 2006, at 3:40 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/29/06, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
>>>> Using svn:externals is probably the easiest way to the the openejb
>>>> sources included for use in a m2 build w/o needing the user to run
>>>> `maven -o m:co` or run `svn co ...` directly yo pull the sources
>>>> for
>>>> the build.
>>>>
>>>> I think this is the best short-term solution to the openejb
>>>> integration issue. I would like to stress that we should
>>>> eventually
>>>> try to remove this source-level dependency for out long-term
>>>> direction.
>>>
>>> Am I right that it's as simple as executing
>>>
>>> $ svn propget svn:externals geronimo
>>> openejb https://svn.codehaus.org/openejb/trunk/openejb2
>>>
>>> ?
>>>
>>> That seems to be an interim yet elegant solution. It's a bug fix
>>> so no
>>> need to RTC it.
>>>
>>>> --jason
>>>
>>> Jacek
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jacek Laskowski
>>> http://www.laskowski.net.pl
>>
>
|