geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Genender <jgenen...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Dublin - Clustering get-together.... - Thurs aft/eve..
Date Thu, 29 Jun 2006 14:24:15 GMT
Hi Greg,

Thanks for the ping.  Let me see what I can get together...

Jeff



Greg Wilkins wrote:
> Jeff,
> 
> this suggestion is probably too late....  
> 
> but given the deficiencies of dialin, would it be possible for you to post a short
> summary of where your work with clustering is at?
> 
> Is there a page on the(a?) wiki about the approach you are taking?
> I can see the tomcat clustering page
> 
>   http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/clustering.html
> 
> and the overview page
>   http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC10/clustering.html
> 
> but nothing on kluster or the session API
> 
> cheers
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Jeff Genender wrote:> 
>> Jules Gosnell wrote:
>>> Guys,
>>>
>>> Covalent had to commit to a time - we went for 6:00pm on thursday.
>>>
>>> I realise that this may be a little earlier than some of you were hoping
>>> for, but it was the best we could do at short notice - sorry.
>>>
>>> One further problem. We were not able to organise conferencing
>>> facilities. If anyone thinks that they can work around this, perhaps via
>>> skype or something, I would be happy to try to set something up - Has
>>> anyone run a skype conference with 4 or 5 participants before ? Would
>>> you like us to try?
>>>
>> Well, thats ok...thanks for giving a shot.
>>
>> I would ask that we bring as much to the lists afterwards as there are
>> others who have/are doing considerable work in the clustering area and
>> are not able to be there.  It would be nice to be engaged in
>> discussions.  Thanks again for trying.
>>
>>> Jules
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Jules Gosnell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I was planning on attending the CeltiXFire BOF at 2100 Dublin time.

>>>>>> 2200 is good from my perspective.
>>>>> That's a little later than I was hoping for - my worry would be that
>>>>> people who might otherwise be there will have packed up and gone home
>>>>> by then.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would rather a slot somewhere between 6:00pm and 9:00pm...
>>>>>
>>>>> How does that sound ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Jules
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Evening you time would be best for me.  It looks like there is
an 8
>>>>>>> hour time diff between Dublin and California, so anything after
6pm
>>>>>>> your time would be good for me (10am here).  I can go maybe an
hour
>>>>>>> earlier, but then I will be sleepy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -dain
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jun 27, 2006, at 1:31 PM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jeff Genender wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jules Gosnell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Are you going to provide a call in line so people
not at the
>>>>>>>>>>> conference can participate?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'll look into it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Would anyone be interested in using such a feature
?
>>>>>>>>> I would likely be interested too depending on time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OK, Jeff - so are there any windows on thurs aft/eve (dublin
time)
>>>>>>>> which would not suit you ? Let us know, so that we can avoid
them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jules
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jules
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -dain
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 27, 2006, at 10:48 AM, Rodent of Unusual
Size wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jules Gosnell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt - I don't think that the problem
was with sponsorship,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but  rather
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exclusion... (maybe I've misunderstood
something?). Covalent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are simply
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> providing a room and beer. The invitation
is open to the entire
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community and you will be driving
the meeting.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That should be cool.  Firstly, it has been announced
here in the
>>>>>>>>>> public list.  Secondly, you should consider putting
up a few
>>>>>>>>>> notice signs around ApacheCon to catch interested
people who
>>>>>>>>>> didn't see this.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, exclusion and lack of openness was the issue.
 The sponsorship
>>>>>>>>>> was mud in the water.  By mentioning this here the
issue is
>>>>>>>>>> rendered
>>>>>>>>>> nonexistent.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Of course, you need to post (here and on those paper
notices) the
>>>>>>>>>> details, such as time and place, as soon as they're
figured out.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Jules.  And thanks for raising this, Matt,
so it can be
>>>>>>>>>> clarified a bit.
>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>> #ken    P-)}
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Ken.Coar.Org/
>>>>>>>>>> Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Millennium hand and shrimp!"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --"Open Source is a self-assembling organism. You dangle
a piece of
>>>>>>>> string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
>>>>>>>> crystallises out around it."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> /**********************************
>>>>>>>>  * Jules Gosnell
>>>>>>>>  * Partner
>>>>>>>>  * Core Developers Network (Europe)
>>>>>>>>  *
>>>>>>>>  *    www.coredevelopers.net
>>>>>>>>  *
>>>>>>>>  * Open Source Training & Support.
>>>>>>>>  **********************************/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>

Mime
View raw message