geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Hogstrom <m...@hogstrom.org>
Subject Re: Why do we have pom.xml files in the 1.1 branch?
Date Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:16:21 GMT
These are the poms in branches/1.1.   I'll delete them unless there is an objection.

.//modules/activation/pom.xml
.//modules/activemq-embedded-rar/pom.xml
.//pom.xml

Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Aaron Mulder wrote:
>> On 6/28/06, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>>> This is correct.  At one time the specs root had a root and that root
>>> was at the root of the geronimo directory.  ;)
>>
>> Does that mean you know for sure that the 1.1 geronimo POM(s) can be
>> deleted safely (because the specs module has moved on and this
>> requirement is no longer there)?  That's how I read your message; I
>> just want to be sure that's correct.
> 
> Sorry about the cheekiness. You are correct.  Specs does not rely on any 
> POM outside of itself.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Alan
>>
>> Thanks,
>>    Aaron
>>
>>
>>> Aaron Mulder wrote:
>>> > I believe at one time the M2 specs module(s) did not build unless you
>>> > had first run a M2 build in the geronimo directory, which did nothing
>>> > except copy the POM into your M2 repo.  I have no idea why, or whether
>>> > that's still an issue.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> >     Aaron
>>> >
>>> > On 6/27/06, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
>>> >> find branches/1.1 -name pom.xml -exec svn rm \{\} \;
>>> >> svn ci
>>> >>
>>> >> --jason
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Jun 27, 2006, at 1:06 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > I'm fine removing them but I am not planning on doing the work
:)
>>> >> >
>>> >> > John Sisson wrote:
>>> >> >> Are these being used/maintained? Should they be deleted to
avoid
>>> >> >> confusion?
>>> >> >> Thanks,
>>> >> >> John
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
> 
> 
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message