geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From John Sisson <jrsis...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Lets start moving to m2
Date Tue, 27 Jun 2006 07:33:00 GMT
I don't think we should be removing files until we have a 100% 
functional m2 build.  The trunk should always be buildable. 

If the M2 build isn't going to be straightforward we should have some 
information in something like the README.txt file documenting how the 
build should be executed.

John

Jason Dillon wrote:
> I think that removing the m1 files is a good idea, as it will help 
> force us to get m2 to build... which really should not take that long 
> to get functional 100% of the time.
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Jun 26, 2006, at 9:19 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>> Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>>> On 6/26/06, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm suggesting that we declare the m1 build obsolete and remove it,
>>>> except possibly for the assembly step and perhaps modules where the
>>>> tests do not run under m2.
>>>
>>> Well, don't get it annoying, but I still don't understand it. Let's
>>> pretend we've named the m1 build obsolete, what's next? Shall we call
>>> a vote? If it passes, what would be the next steps? If you removed the
>>> top-level build.xml I'd know what it'd mean, but now I don't get it.
>>
>> Yes, we call a vote then remove the project.xml/project.properties 
>> files.  build.xml is for Ant; I don't think we use that.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>
>


Mime
View raw message