geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Genender <jgenen...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [CONSENSUS] Default plugin site (was Re: Frustrations of a Release Manager)
Date Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:27:37 GMT
+1 great idea Paul.

Paul McMahan wrote:
> There's an interesting plugin site for eclipse at
> eclipseplugincentral.com that implements some of the ideas we have
> discussed.  It provides a directory of plugins but not the actual
> files themselves, pointing elsewhere for the purchase/download.  It
> also provides a rating system, news page, and discussion forums.  IMHO
> the geronimo project should strive to provide this type of site for
> building a healthy commercial and open source community around
> geronimo plugins.
> 
> The domain names "geronimoplugincentral.com" and
> "geronimoplugincentral.org" were available and match the form used by
> "eclipseplugincentral.com" so I purchased them and would like to
> donate them to the ASF.  How can I do that?  Just send a note to
> infrastructure@apache.org?
> 
> Best wishes,
> Paul
> 
> 
> On 6/14/06, David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com> wrote:
>> Everyone, please read and ACK.
>>
>> On Jun 14, 2006, at 4:31 PM, John Sisson wrote:
>>
>> > Hiram, I care if a private or commercial entity has control over
>> > the default option.
>>
>> I think Hiram does too, he just a read a little too fast.  His
>> thoughts are clear though.
>>
>> On Jun 14, 2006, at 3:55 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>> > All I'm saying is I don't care if IBM puts up
>> > http://www.ibm.com/wasce/plugins, I also don't care if you put up a
>> > http://virtuas.com/geronimo/plugins site.
>> >
>> > Now the default link issue is something else.  Can we point it by
>> > default at some Apache machines by default?  I'm sure Aaron would not
>> > mind, would you?
>>
>> That pretty much sums it up for me.  Aaron seems to agree.  In fact,
>> is there anyone out there who doesn't agree?
>>
>> -David
>>
>>

Mime
View raw message