geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <>
Subject Re: [CONSENSUS] Default plugin site (was Re: Frustrations of a Release Manager)
Date Sun, 18 Jun 2006 20:23:42 GMT
David Blevins wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2006, at 2:27 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>> David Blevins wrote:
>>> Everyone, please read and ACK.
>>> On Jun 14, 2006, at 4:31 PM, John Sisson wrote:
>>>> Hiram, I care if a private or commercial entity has control over 
>>>> the default option.
>>> I think Hiram does too, he just a read a little too fast.  His 
>>> thoughts are clear though.
>>> On Jun 14, 2006, at 3:55 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>>>> All I'm saying is I don't care if IBM puts up
>>>>, I also don't care if you put up a
>>>> site.
>>>> Now the default link issue is something else.  Can we point it by
>>>> default at some Apache machines by default?  I'm sure Aaron would not
>>>> mind, would you?
>>> That pretty much sums it up for me.  Aaron seems to agree.  In fact, 
>>> is there anyone out there who doesn't agree?
>> A nice temporary solution.  I think that we can come up w/ something 
>> better than an either/or link to plugin servers.
> I know what you mean.  Maven has an ordered list of repos and there 
> isn't really a "default" sans the fact the list is seeded with 
>  We could seed with two or three repos if we had em.
It would be cool if we could leverage the Apache mirror system for 
plugins.  It would be cool if Maven came up with a wagon that could use 
the Apache mirror system for repos.


View raw message