geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <>
Subject Re: Where did the 1.1 branch go?!?!
Date Thu, 15 Jun 2006 18:55:36 GMT
David Blevins wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2006, at 11:18 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>> David Jencks wrote:
>>> -0.5 to copying branches/1.1 to branches/1.1.x and then copying or 
>>> moving to tags/1.1.x  Since ONLY BUG FIXES can possibly be added to 
>>> branches/1.1, this should not cause problems.  The release manager 
>>> gets say over what goes into a release, they can revert changes they 
>>> don't want in the release.  I think the copy to branches/1.1.x just 
>>> adds steps for no gain.
>> I would upgrade this to a -1 on my part.
> Think you're getting kind of nit-picky on what you think is easiest 
> for a release manager to do.  I'd rather see us simply agree on what 
> the end result should be.
> IMHO, if a release manager wants to copy into a temp location while 
> they finalize the release (which can take days) to remove the risk of 
> having to roll back accidental changes, that's fine.

While I agree with your statements, I think that the point that DJ and I 
were trying to make was that there is no need for a branches/1.1.x 
branch as a temp location if no one is modifying branches/1.1.  This is 
the case if we only put bug fixes into 1.x branches.


View raw message