geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <l...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: Where did the 1.1 branch go?!?!
Date Thu, 15 Jun 2006 18:26:01 GMT
Aaron Mulder wrote:
> OK, so I see David Blevins has now created branches/1.1.1.  That still
> wasn't what I expected.  I expect branches/1.1 to be the 1.1.x HEAD at
> all times.  I don't expect us to continue to change it to
> branches/1.1.1 branches/1.1.2 branches/1.1.3 etc.  That has the same
> disadvantages I originally noted, namely that if you have pending work
> in the branch that you decide not to check in until after a release
> then you're kind of screwed, and you have to re-check out the branch
> after every dot release, and so on.  I'm thinking more like
>
> HEAD-----------------
>  `branches/1.1
>      `tags/1.1.0
>      `tags/1.1.1
>      `tags/1.1.2
>  `branches/1.2
>      `tags/1.2.0
>      `tags/1.2.1
>      `tags/1.2.2
>  `branches/1.3
>     ...
>  `branches/2.0
>      `tags/2.0.0
>      `tags/2.0.1
>      `tags/2.0.2
> ...
>
> Is that not what others are planning on?
>
> Does anyone mind if I move branches/1.1.1 back to branches/1.1?

Putting aside the discussion as to what goes into branches/1.x, this all 
makes sense to me.


Regards,
Alan



Mime
View raw message