geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dave Colasurdo <davec...@earthlink.net>
Subject Re: rc1 Status and Next Steps
Date Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:52:02 GMT
John Sisson wrote:

>> 6. Third Party Licenses.  This needs to be reviewed and the 
>> appropriate licenses compiled. Volunteers?  We did not have one in the 
>> 1.0 stream so I'd like clarification if this is a requirement or 
>> something that can be deferred.
> IMO this is a requirement.  Just have a look at some of the licenses for 
> components we are redistributing.
> 
> I have collated a list of components attached to a file in 
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2112 indicating whether 
> IMHO they require an attribution in the NOTICES.txt file or a license 
> included in the LICENSE.txt file and where to get the information from.
> There are some that require further investigation as IMNAL.  Can people 
> please look at the file attached to GERONIMO-2112 and see if there are 
> any obvious omissions/errors and comment on the items requiring further 
> investigation.
> 
> If someone has time to pick it up from and start assembling the 
> LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt files, please do, otherwise I'll continue in 
> the morning (Sydney time).
> 

John,
I am also investigating.  I suspect jdom and castor may also need to be 
added to the list..  Will make an initial pass at the files and attach 
them to GERONIMO-2112.. Of course IANAL.. :)

Thanks
-Dave-

Mime
View raw message