geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <l...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: [Vote] 1.1-rc1 Now Available
Date Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:42:27 GMT
We vote for release candidates?  I don't recall doing that before.

+1


Regards,
Alan


Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> I apologize for resending this to the lists.  I inadvertantly did not 
> put [vote] in the subject line so it may not have been apparent.  The 
> remainder of this e-mail is the same content that was distributed last 
> night.
>
> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> Over the past few days the outstanding issues that were raised about 
>> the first candidate have been addressed.
>>
>> They were that we were missing the LICENSE.txt as well as Notices 
>> from the distribution.  I added them.  Guillaume also pointed out 
>> that he noted that there should be a Third Party Notices.  This was 
>> not included in the original 1.0 or previous distributions so I did 
>> not follow it up.  Thoughts?
>>
>> Also, the 1.0 release notes were removed and updated the thread 
>> started by Hernan.  The Wiki has been updated and the wiki was the 
>> source used to create the RELEASE-NOTES-1.1.txt file you will find in 
>> the build.
>>
>> To avoid issues with the version number and the plugins I used rc1 
>> which Aaron had added in the plugins for supported versions so I 
>> trust that works here.
>>
>> JSisson addressed the problem with not being able to run Geronimo 
>> under CygWin and Kevan worked with Aaron to address a new deployment 
>> problem that left partially deployed artifacts in the repository.
>>
>> I have taken this build and run some performance tests on it and we 
>> are significantly better in 1.1 than we were in 1.0.  We have a lot 
>> of improvement left for CMP EJBs.  It appears that the performance 
>> improvements in the EJB tier has changed a race condition when 
>> running under DB2.  I'm afraid that the only way to address the 
>> problem is to add a new feature to TranQL and OEJB that allow for the 
>> specification of Isolation Levels for individual beans.  This is a 
>> relatively simple change but the build as it stands is specification 
>> compliant.  I would prefer to let this release go forward since CMP 
>> 2.1 EJBs are not nearly as common as the other J2EE components.  I 
>> would like to address this in 1.1.1 however I don't think we've 
>> locked down whether that would be allowed or not.  The change would 
>> affect TranQL and OpenEJB so they are really included components so 
>> I'd be interested in people's feedback.
>>
>> So please accept a named RC1.  Your voting and feedback are for:
>>
>> Geronimo 1.1
>> DayTrader 1.1
>> Specs 1.1
>>
>> The vote will stand for 72 hours.  Issues raised will be discussed 
>> and if we conclude that there is a bug that must be addressed then we 
>> will mitigate the problem and respin a new rc for a 72 hour vote.
>>
>> If this is accepted all three of the above components will be 
>> released simultaneously.
>>
>> Here are the builds for your review and comment:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.1-rc1.tar.gz 
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.1-rc1.zip
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.1-rc1.tar.gz 
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-romcat-j2ee-1.1-rc1.zip
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-minimal-1.1-rc1.tar.gz 
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-minimal-1.1-rc1.zip 
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-tomcat-minimal-1.1-rc1.tar.gz 
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-tomcat-minimal-1.1-rc1.zip 
>>
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/daytrader-ear-1.1-rc1.zip
>>
>>
>> Looking forward to your comments and feedback.
>>
>>


Mime
View raw message