geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Genender <jgenen...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [Vote] 1.1-rc1 Now Available
Date Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:05:35 GMT
+1

Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> I apologize for resending this to the lists.  I inadvertantly did not
> put [vote] in the subject line so it may not have been apparent.  The
> remainder of this e-mail is the same content that was distributed last
> night.
> 
> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> Over the past few days the outstanding issues that were raised about
>> the first candidate have been addressed.
>>
>> They were that we were missing the LICENSE.txt as well as Notices from
>> the distribution.  I added them.  Guillaume also pointed out that he
>> noted that there should be a Third Party Notices.  This was not
>> included in the original 1.0 or previous distributions so I did not
>> follow it up.  Thoughts?
>>
>> Also, the 1.0 release notes were removed and updated the thread
>> started by Hernan.  The Wiki has been updated and the wiki was the
>> source used to create the RELEASE-NOTES-1.1.txt file you will find in
>> the build.
>>
>> To avoid issues with the version number and the plugins I used rc1
>> which Aaron had added in the plugins for supported versions so I trust
>> that works here.
>>
>> JSisson addressed the problem with not being able to run Geronimo
>> under CygWin and Kevan worked with Aaron to address a new deployment
>> problem that left partially deployed artifacts in the repository.
>>
>> I have taken this build and run some performance tests on it and we
>> are significantly better in 1.1 than we were in 1.0.  We have a lot of
>> improvement left for CMP EJBs.  It appears that the performance
>> improvements in the EJB tier has changed a race condition when running
>> under DB2.  I'm afraid that the only way to address the problem is to
>> add a new feature to TranQL and OEJB that allow for the specification
>> of Isolation Levels for individual beans.  This is a relatively simple
>> change but the build as it stands is specification compliant.  I would
>> prefer to let this release go forward since CMP 2.1 EJBs are not
>> nearly as common as the other J2EE components.  I would like to
>> address this in 1.1.1 however I don't think we've locked down whether
>> that would be allowed or not.  The change would affect TranQL and
>> OpenEJB so they are really included components so I'd be interested in
>> people's feedback.
>>
>> So please accept a named RC1.  Your voting and feedback are for:
>>
>> Geronimo 1.1
>> DayTrader 1.1
>> Specs 1.1
>>
>> The vote will stand for 72 hours.  Issues raised will be discussed and
>> if we conclude that there is a bug that must be addressed then we will
>> mitigate the problem and respin a new rc for a 72 hour vote.
>>
>> If this is accepted all three of the above components will be released
>> simultaneously.
>>
>> Here are the builds for your review and comment:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.1-rc1.tar.gz
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.1-rc1.zip
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.1-rc1.tar.gz
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-romcat-j2ee-1.1-rc1.zip
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-minimal-1.1-rc1.tar.gz
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-minimal-1.1-rc1.zip
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-tomcat-minimal-1.1-rc1.tar.gz
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-tomcat-minimal-1.1-rc1.zip
>>
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/daytrader-ear-1.1-rc1.zip
>>
>>
>> Looking forward to your comments and feedback.
>>
>>

Mime
View raw message