geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Hogstrom <m...@hogstrom.org>
Subject [Vote] 1.1-rc1 Now Available
Date Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:00:10 GMT
I apologize for resending this to the lists.  I inadvertantly did not put [vote] in the subject
line 
so it may not have been apparent.  The remainder of this e-mail is the same content that was

distributed last night.

Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> Over the past few days the outstanding issues that were raised about the 
> first candidate have been addressed.
> 
> They were that we were missing the LICENSE.txt as well as Notices from 
> the distribution.  I added them.  Guillaume also pointed out that he 
> noted that there should be a Third Party Notices.  This was not included 
> in the original 1.0 or previous distributions so I did not follow it 
> up.  Thoughts?
> 
> Also, the 1.0 release notes were removed and updated the thread started 
> by Hernan.  The Wiki has been updated and the wiki was the source used 
> to create the RELEASE-NOTES-1.1.txt file you will find in the build.
> 
> To avoid issues with the version number and the plugins I used rc1 which 
> Aaron had added in the plugins for supported versions so I trust that 
> works here.
> 
> JSisson addressed the problem with not being able to run Geronimo under 
> CygWin and Kevan worked with Aaron to address a new deployment problem 
> that left partially deployed artifacts in the repository.
> 
> I have taken this build and run some performance tests on it and we are 
> significantly better in 1.1 than we were in 1.0.  We have a lot of 
> improvement left for CMP EJBs.  It appears that the performance 
> improvements in the EJB tier has changed a race condition when running 
> under DB2.  I'm afraid that the only way to address the problem is to 
> add a new feature to TranQL and OEJB that allow for the specification of 
> Isolation Levels for individual beans.  This is a relatively simple 
> change but the build as it stands is specification compliant.  I would 
> prefer to let this release go forward since CMP 2.1 EJBs are not nearly 
> as common as the other J2EE components.  I would like to address this in 
> 1.1.1 however I don't think we've locked down whether that would be 
> allowed or not.  The change would affect TranQL and OpenEJB so they are 
> really included components so I'd be interested in people's feedback.
> 
> So please accept a named RC1.  Your voting and feedback are for:
> 
> Geronimo 1.1
> DayTrader 1.1
> Specs 1.1
> 
> The vote will stand for 72 hours.  Issues raised will be discussed and 
> if we conclude that there is a bug that must be addressed then we will 
> mitigate the problem and respin a new rc for a 72 hour vote.
> 
> If this is accepted all three of the above components will be released 
> simultaneously.
> 
> Here are the builds for your review and comment:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.1-rc1.tar.gz
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.1-rc1.zip
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.1-rc1.tar.gz
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-romcat-j2ee-1.1-rc1.zip
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-minimal-1.1-rc1.tar.gz 
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-minimal-1.1-rc1.zip
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-tomcat-minimal-1.1-rc1.tar.gz 
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-tomcat-minimal-1.1-rc1.zip
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/daytrader-ear-1.1-rc1.zip
> 
> 
> Looking forward to your comments and feedback.
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message