geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Genender <jgenen...@apache.org>
Subject Re: GBeans representing separately persistent data
Date Mon, 12 Jun 2006 02:55:53 GMT


Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Jeff Genender wrote:
>> Aaron Mulder wrote:
>>   
>>> On 6/11/06, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>>>     
>>>> Following your analogy we would be making GBeans for individual EJB
>>>> instances.  What am I missing?
>>>>       
>>> I guess you're missing JSR-77, which seems to say that we should have
>>> GBeans for individual EJB instances.  Servlets too.
>>>     
>>
>> Which part of JSR-77 says we need GBeans for Servlets?  I will be
>> surprised of that spec even has the word "GBean" in it.
>>
>> I do believe the servlets have MBean access.  Is this what you are
>> referring to?
>>   
> 
> I think that there is an important distinction here.  There's a
> difference between providing JMX access and what features deployment
> capabilities have.  For example, while I may have access to an
> individual instance of an entity bean, I'm not sure because, thank god,
> I do not know JSR-77, I am certain that one cannot *create* an instance
> of an entity bean using GBean.  One can only create its container.

Agreed 100%.

> 
> 
> Regards,
> Alan
> 
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message