geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <>
Subject Re: GBeans representing separately persistent data
Date Mon, 12 Jun 2006 02:47:57 GMT
Jeff Genender wrote:
> Aaron Mulder wrote:
>> On 6/11/06, Alan D. Cabrera <> wrote:
>>> Following your analogy we would be making GBeans for individual EJB
>>> instances.  What am I missing?
>> I guess you're missing JSR-77, which seems to say that we should have
>> GBeans for individual EJB instances.  Servlets too.
> Which part of JSR-77 says we need GBeans for Servlets?  I will be
> surprised of that spec even has the word "GBean" in it.
> I do believe the servlets have MBean access.  Is this what you are
> referring to?

I think that there is an important distinction here.  There's a 
difference between providing JMX access and what features deployment 
capabilities have.  For example, while I may have access to an 
individual instance of an entity bean, I'm not sure because, thank god, 
I do not know JSR-77, I am certain that one cannot *create* an instance 
of an entity bean using GBean.  One can only create its container.


View raw message